hummingbird: be a part of animal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, bird
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, insect
Weight: 0.56
, visitor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37
, robin
Weight: 0.37
, blue bird
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of animal 1.00
be defined as this animal 0.89
be a part of animal kingdom 0.85
be person pet 0.81
defend other animal 0.81
be used to have for pet 0.81
be used to pet 0.81
be pet 0.80
prey eat small animal 0.80
be use as pet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bird, prey eat small animal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bird, be pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animal, be pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bird, prey eat small animal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bird, prey eat small animal)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bird, be pet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to pet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be defined as this animal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bird, prey eat small animal)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lizard, be defined as this animal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lizard, be defined as this animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hummingbird, be a part of animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bird, prey eat small animal)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(lizard, be defined as this animal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bird, prey eat small animal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(hummingbird, be a part of animal)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)