hummingbird: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, bird
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, insect
Weight: 0.56
, visitor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37
, robin
Weight: 0.37
, blue bird
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be at state park 0.91
be at reptile park 0.81
land on beach 0.77
be at fairground 0.76
be find in zoo 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be at park)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be at park)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(animal, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be at park)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(animal, be find in zoo)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be at park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bird, be at park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(animal, be at state park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(animal, be find in zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bird, be at park)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at park)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at state park)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animal, be find in zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at reptile park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at park)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(animal, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(animal, be find in zoo)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(lizard, be at reptile park)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at reptile park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hummingbird, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hummingbird, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bird, be at park)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(animal, be at park)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(animal, be at state park)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be find in zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, be at reptile park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bird, be at park)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(animal, be at park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(animal, be at state park)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hummingbird, be at park)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be find in zoo)