hummingbird: flap wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, bird
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, insect
Weight: 0.56
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37
, robin
Weight: 0.37
, heron
Weight: 0.37
, wren
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
flap wings 1.00
flap fast wings 0.97
has physical part wings 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap wings)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hummingbird, flap wings)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap fast wings)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hummingbird, has physical part wings)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part wings)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part wings)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hummingbird, has physical part wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hummingbird, flap wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hummingbird, flap wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)