hummingbird: have hollow beaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, bird
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, insect
Weight: 0.56
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37
, robin
Weight: 0.37
, heron
Weight: 0.37
, wren
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hollow beaks 1.00
have long beaks 0.90
has physical part beaks 0.88
have slender beaks 0.87
stick out tongues 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heron, have long beaks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, stick out tongues)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hummingbird, has physical part beaks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(hummingbird, stick out tongues)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hummingbird, stick out tongues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, stick out tongues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hummingbird, have long beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hummingbird, have slender beaks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, have slender beaks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, has physical part beaks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, have slender beaks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hummingbird, have long beaks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, have long beaks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hummingbird, have slender beaks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hummingbird, has physical part beaks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, has physical part beaks)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hummingbird, have long beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(heron, have long beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hummingbird, have hollow beaks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)