humor: be different than american humor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings honesty
Weight: 0.35
, warmth
Weight: 0.34
, character
Weight: 0.34
, wit
Weight: 0.34
, intellect
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different than american humor 1.00
be superior to american humor 0.93
be different than humor 0.93
differ from humor 0.87
be superior to humor 0.86
be much funnier than american 0.85
be different than american 0.84
is funny 0.80
differ from aqueous humor 0.79
be funny in number 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wit, is funny)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(wit, is funny)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wit, is funny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(humor, be different than american humor)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(humor, differ from humor)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(humor, be superior to american humor)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(humor, differ from humor)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(humor, differ from humor)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(humor, be superior to american humor)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(humor, be superior to american humor)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(humor, be much funnier than american)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(humor, be different than american)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(humor, differ from aqueous humor)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(humor, be different than american)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(humor, be much funnier than american)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(humor, be different than american)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(humor, be much funnier than american)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(humor, differ from aqueous humor)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(humor, is funny)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(humor, be funny in number)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(humor, be superior to american humor)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(humor, differ from aqueous humor)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(humor, is funny)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(humor, is funny)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(humor, be funny in number)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(humor, be funny in number)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(humor, be much funnier than american)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(humor, be different than american)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(humor, is funny)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(humor, differ from humor)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(humor, differ from aqueous humor)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(humor, be funny in number)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(humor, be different than american humor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(humor, be different than american humor)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wit, is funny)