hump: be important to camel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.49
, structure
Weight: 0.47
, problem
Weight: 0.45
, mountain
Weight: 0.40
Siblings big bang
Weight: 0.30
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.30
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.30
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.30
, beat
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to camel 1.00
be useful to camels 0.86
be most likely helpful to camels 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(hump, be important to camel)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hump, be useful to camels)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hump, be most likely helpful to camels)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hump, be useful to camels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hump, be useful to camels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hump, be most likely helpful to camels)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hump, be most likely helpful to camels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hump, be useful to camels)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hump, be most likely helpful to camels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hump, be important to camel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hump, be important to camel)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hump, be important to camel)