hunger: affect learning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect learning 1.00
be based learning 0.86
affect school students 0.78
affect children 0.77
affect high school students 0.76
affect to performance of students 0.76
affect to academic performance of students 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(problem, be based learning)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, affect learning)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sensation, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, affect learning)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(problem, affect to academic performance of students)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, affect learning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(sensation, affect learning)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(problem, affect to academic performance of students)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(problem, be based learning)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sensation, affect learning)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(problem, be based learning)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(problem, affect to academic performance of students)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(problem, be based learning)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hunger, affect learning)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sensation, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hunger, affect learning)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(problem, affect to academic performance of students)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hunger, affect learning)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hunger, affect learning)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(hunger, affect children)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hunger, affect children)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hunger, affect children)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(hunger, affect children)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, affect learning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sensation, affect learning)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, be based learning)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(problem, affect to academic performance of students)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sensation, affect learning)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, be based learning)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, affect learning)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(problem, affect to academic performance of students)