hunger: be problem in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in africa 1.00
be in africa problem 1.00
be in africa thing 0.93
be in africa 0.92
exist in africa 0.89
affect people in africa 0.89
be in america problem 0.89
be problem in america 0.89
be common in africa 0.88
be in south africa 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(famine, be common in africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in africa thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(starvation, be in africa thing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in africa thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(famine, be problem in africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(famine, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(famine, be in africa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(famine, be common in africa)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(famine, be common in africa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(starvation, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in america)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(hunger, exist in africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in america)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in america)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in america problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in america problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hunger, be in america problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hunger, be in africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(hunger, be in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hunger, affect people in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hunger, exist in africa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hunger, be in america problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hunger, affect people in africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(hunger, exist in africa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in africa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(hunger, affect people in africa)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hunger, affect people in africa)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hunger, exist in africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(starvation, be in africa thing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(famine, be problem in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(famine, be in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(starvation, be in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(famine, be common in africa)