hunger: be problem in germany

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in germany 1.00
be in america problem 0.87
be problem in america 0.87
be problem in india 0.87
be problem in africa 0.84
be in africa problem 0.84
be in egypt affect america 0.80
be in america 0.79
be with russia 0.78
exist in america 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(need, be in america)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(need, be in america)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(need, be in america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(need, be in america)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(famine, be problem in africa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(starvation, be problem in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in america)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in america)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in america problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in america)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hunger, be in america problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in america problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hunger, be in america problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(hunger, be in america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hunger, be in america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hunger, exist in america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hunger, exist in america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(hunger, exist in america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, exist in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(need, be in america)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(famine, be problem in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(starvation, be problem in africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(need, be in america)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, be in egypt affect america)