hunger: be problem in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in india 1.00
be in america problem 0.90
be problem in america 0.90
be problem in africa 0.87
be in africa problem 0.87
be problem in germany 0.87
be in egypt affect america 0.80
is world problem 0.80
be in america 0.80
be in africa thing 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in india)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(need, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(need, be in america)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(need, be in america)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in africa thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in india)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(need, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(famine, be problem in africa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(starvation, be in africa thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in africa thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(starvation, be problem in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in india)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in america)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in america)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in america problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in america)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hunger, be in america problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in america problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in germany)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in germany)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in germany)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hunger, be in america problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(hunger, be in america)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hunger, be in america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in germany)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in africa problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, is world problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hunger, is world problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hunger, is world problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(need, be in america)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(famine, be problem in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(starvation, be in africa thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(starvation, be problem in africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(need, be in america)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hunger, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, be in egypt affect america)