hunger: is major problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is major problem 1.00
is major world problem 0.96
is world problem 0.88
has state problem 0.87
be ongoing problem 0.81
be different from problems 0.81
be research problem 0.80
be in america problem 0.78
be problem in america 0.78
be problem in india 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hunger, is major problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(famine, be ongoing problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(famine, be ongoing problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(famine, be ongoing problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hunger, is major problem)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(hunger, is major world problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hunger, is major world problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major world problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, is world problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hunger, has state problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in america problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hunger, is world problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hunger, be in america problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hunger, is world problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hunger, be in america problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in america problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hunger, is major problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(famine, be ongoing problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(hunger, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)