hunger: is major social problem

Related concepts

Parents	desire Weight: 0.66 , sensation Weight: 0.64 , need Weight: 0.62 , problem Weight: 0.62 , symptom Weight: 0.61
Siblings	famine Weight: 0.34 , starvation Weight: 0.34 , thirst Weight: 0.34 , mental health problem Weight: 0.34 , ambition Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is major social problem	1.00
is social problem	0.94
is social	0.84
is major	0.84
be related to social change	0.84
has state problem	0.83
be different from sociological problems	0.80
be ongoing problem	0.79
is social justice issue	0.79
be different from problems	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(hunger, is major social problem)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(hunger, is major social problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(problem, be related to social change)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(problem, be different from sociological problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(famine, be ongoing problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(hunger, is major social problem)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(hunger, is major social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(famine, be ongoing problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(famine, be ongoing problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(hunger, is major social problem)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(hunger, is social)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(hunger, is social justice issue)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(hunger, is social problem)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(hunger, is social justice issue)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(hunger, is social)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(hunger, has state problem)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(hunger, is social problem)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(hunger, is social)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(hunger, is major)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(hunger, is major)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(hunger, is major)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(hunger, is major social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(problem, be different from sociological problems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(famine, be ongoing problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(problem, be different from sociological problems)