hunger: is social problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social problem 1.00
is major social problem 0.94
is social 0.88
has state problem 0.85
be related to social change 0.83
is social justice issue 0.83
be different from sociological problems 0.81
be research problem 0.79
be different from problems 0.79
be ongoing problem 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(problem, be related to social change)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(problem, be different from sociological problems)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(famine, be ongoing problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(famine, be ongoing problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(famine, be ongoing problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(hunger, is social problem)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hunger, is social justice issue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hunger, is major social problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is social)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hunger, is social justice issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hunger, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major social problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hunger, is social)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hunger, is major social problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(problem, be different from sociological problems)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(famine, be ongoing problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(problem, be different from sociological problems)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)