hunting: affect environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pursuit
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.57
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.36
, fishing
Weight: 0.34
, camping
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect environment 1.00
be to environment 0.91
be for environment 0.89
help environment 0.88
have affect 0.82
affect economy 0.80
affect eco system 0.77
have affect on organisms 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hunting, affect environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(activity, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fishing, help environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunting, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fishing, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fishing, affect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fishing, help environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fishing, help environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(fishing, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fishing, be for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hunting, affect environment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be for environment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(hunting, help environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, have affect)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect eco system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hunting, have affect on organisms)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hunting, have affect on organisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(hunting, affect economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunting, help environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hunting, have affect)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hunting, affect economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hunting, be to environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hunting, help environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hunting, affect eco system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hunting, help environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hunting, have affect on organisms)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hunting, be for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hunting, have affect)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hunting, be to environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hunting, have affect)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(hunting, have affect on organisms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hunting, affect economy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hunting, be for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hunting, affect eco system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hunting, be for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hunting, affect eco system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hunting, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fishing, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fishing, help environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fishing, be for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(hunting, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)