hunting: affect kids

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pursuit
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.57
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.36
, fishing
Weight: 0.34
, camping
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect kids 1.00
have affect 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sport, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hunting, affect kids)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sport, affect kids)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sport, affect kids)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sport, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(hunting, affect kids)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(hunting, affect kids)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hunting, have affect)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hunting, have affect)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hunting, have affect)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, have affect)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect kids)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hunting, affect kids)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sport, affect kids)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(hunting, affect kids)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sport, affect kids)