hunting: be to use of life resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pursuit
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.57
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.36
, fishing
Weight: 0.34
, canoeing
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to use of life resources 1.00
be to wise use of life resources 0.93
be to use of wild life resources 0.92
be to use of renewable life resources 0.90
be to wise use of renewable life resources 0.89
be to wise use of wild life resources 0.88
be to use of renewable wild life resources 0.87
be to wise use of renewable wild life resources 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hunting, be to use of life resources)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use of life resources)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to use of wild life resources)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to use of renewable life resources)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use of renewable life resources)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use of wild life resources)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to use of renewable wild life resources)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use of renewable wild life resources)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hunting, be to use of renewable life resources)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wise use of life resources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(hunting, be to use of wild life resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use of life resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wise use of renewable life resources)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wise use of life resources)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wise use of wild life resources)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hunting, be to use of renewable wild life resources)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wise use of renewable wild life resources)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to use of wild life resources)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hunting, be to use of wild life resources)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to use of renewable life resources)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wise use of renewable life resources)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wise use of wild life resources)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hunting, be to use of renewable life resources)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to use of renewable wild life resources)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wise use of renewable wild life resources)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use of wild life resources)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use of renewable life resources)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hunting, be to use of renewable wild life resources)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use of renewable wild life resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to use of life resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(hunting, be to use of life resources)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hunting, be to use of life resources)