hunting: have affect on organisms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pursuit
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.57
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.36
, fishing
Weight: 0.34
, camping
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have affect on organisms 1.00
have affect 0.80
affect environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hunting, have affect on organisms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(activity, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hunting, have affect on organisms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fishing, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fishing, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(hunting, have affect on organisms)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, have affect)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hunting, affect environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hunting, have affect)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunting, affect environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hunting, have affect)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hunting, have affect)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hunting, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hunting, have affect on organisms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hunting, have affect on organisms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fishing, affect environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hunting, have affect on organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)