hurricane: be named after woman

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cyclone
Weight: 0.67
, tornado
Weight: 0.67
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.67
, storm
Weight: 0.66
, tragedy
Weight: 0.63
Siblings rita
Weight: 0.55
, typhoon
Weight: 0.37
, flood
Weight: 0.35
, earthquake
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be named after woman 1.00
be named after girl name 0.92
be named after women 0.90
be named after men 0.90
be named after people 0.89
were named after women 0.88
be named after girls 0.87
were named after women then 0.87
be named after white people 0.87
be named after females 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(storm, be named after people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hurricane, be named after woman)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(storm, be named after females)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hurricane, be named after woman)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(storm, be named after people)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(storm, be named after females)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(storm, be named after people)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(storm, be named after females)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, be named after women)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(typhoon, be named after females)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(storm, be named after people)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(storm, be named after females)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(typhoon, be named after women)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(typhoon, be named after women)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(typhoon, be named after females)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(typhoon, be named after females)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(hurricane, be named after woman)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after women)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(hurricane, be named after women)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hurricane, be named after women)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be named after women)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hurricane, be named after people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hurricane, be named after females)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after females)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be named after females)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hurricane, be named after people)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hurricane, be named after females)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hurricane, be named after people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hurricane, be named after woman)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(storm, be named after people)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(storm, be named after females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(typhoon, be named after women)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(typhoon, be named after females)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(storm, be named after people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(hurricane, be named after woman)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(storm, be named after females)