huskies: is bad dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.62
, team
Weight: 0.51
, breed
Weight: 0.46
, group
Weight: 0.38
, tie
Weight: 0.34
Siblings small dog
Weight: 0.36
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.36
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.36
, dachshund
Weight: 0.35
, beagle
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad dogs 1.00
is good dogs 0.97
is dogs 0.94
is good dog 0.93
is dangerous dogs 0.92
is best dogs 0.91
is dog 0.89
is good pets 0.88
is derp dog 0.88
make good pets 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is dog)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dachshund, is dog)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is dog)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(beagle, make good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(huskies, is bad dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(huskies, is dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(huskies, is dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(huskies, is dog)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(huskies, is dog)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(huskies, is good dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(huskies, is good dog)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(huskies, is dangerous dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(huskies, is dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(huskies, is dog)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(huskies, is best dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(huskies, is dangerous dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is dangerous dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(huskies, is dangerous dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(huskies, make good pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(huskies, is good dog)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(huskies, is good dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is good dog)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is good dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is best dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(huskies, is good dog)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(huskies, is best dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(huskies, is good dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(huskies, is best dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(huskies, make good pets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(huskies, make good pets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is dog)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(huskies, make good pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(dachshund, is dog)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, make good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(huskies, is bad dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)