huskies: survive in antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.62
, team
Weight: 0.51
, breed
Weight: 0.46
, group
Weight: 0.38
, tie
Weight: 0.34
Siblings small dog
Weight: 0.36
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.36
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.36
, dachshund
Weight: 0.35
, beagle
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in antarctica 1.00
survive 0.90
survive in cold 0.85
were important in antarctica 0.80
be allowed in antarctica 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(huskies, survive in antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(huskies, were important in antarctica)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(huskies, survive in cold)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(huskies, survive in cold)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(huskies, be allowed in antarctica)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(huskies, were important in antarctica)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(huskies, be allowed in antarctica)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(huskies, be allowed in antarctica)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(huskies, were important in antarctica)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(huskies, be allowed in antarctica)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(huskies, survive in cold)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(huskies, were important in antarctica)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(huskies, survive in cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(huskies, survive in antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(huskies, survive in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(huskies, survive in antarctica)