huskies: were important in antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.62
, team
Weight: 0.51
, breed
Weight: 0.46
, group
Weight: 0.38
, tie
Weight: 0.34
Siblings small dog
Weight: 0.36
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.36
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.36
, dachshund
Weight: 0.35
, beagle
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important in antarctica 1.00
were taken to antarctica 0.85
were removed from antarctica 0.81
be allowed in antarctica 0.80
were romoved from antarctic 0.80
survive in antarctica 0.80
were banned from antarctica 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(huskies, were important in antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(huskies, survive in antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(huskies, survive in antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(huskies, survive in antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(huskies, survive in antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(huskies, were taken to antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(huskies, be allowed in antarctica)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(huskies, be allowed in antarctica)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(huskies, were taken to antarctica)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(huskies, be allowed in antarctica)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(huskies, were taken to antarctica)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(huskies, be allowed in antarctica)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(huskies, were taken to antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(huskies, were important in antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(huskies, were important in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(huskies, were important in antarctica)