hvac: jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents system
Weight: 0.62
, application
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.58
, trade
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plumbing
Weight: 0.34
, household appliance
Weight: 0.33
, boiler
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33
, ventilation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
jobs 1.00
has state jobs 0.94
has state job 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(boiler, has state jobs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(boiler, jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(boiler, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(boiler, has state jobs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(boiler, jobs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(boiler, jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hvac, jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hvac, has state jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(hvac, has state jobs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hvac, has state jobs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hvac, has state jobs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hvac, has state job)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(hvac, has state job)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hvac, has state job)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hvac, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hvac, jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hvac, jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(boiler, has state jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(boiler, jobs)