hybridization: affect effect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, step
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.53
Siblings synthesis
Weight: 0.34
, speciation
Weight: 0.33
, meiosis
Weight: 0.32
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.32
, replication
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect effect 1.00
affect electronegativity 0.89
influence effect 0.88
affect inductive effect 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hybridization, affect effect)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect electronegativity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hybridization, influence effect)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect inductive effect)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hybridization, affect inductive effect)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hybridization, affect electronegativity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hybridization, influence effect)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hybridization, influence effect)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hybridization, influence effect)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hybridization, affect inductive effect)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(hybridization, affect inductive effect)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hybridization, affect electronegativity)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hybridization, affect electronegativity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hybridization, affect effect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(hybridization, affect effect)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hybridization, affect effect)