hyderabad: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.64
, state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.54
, name
Weight: 0.51
Siblings mumbai
Weight: 0.35
, karachi
Weight: 0.35
, quebec city
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34
, chennai
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hyderabad, is boring)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chennai, is boring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hyderabad, is boring)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(chennai, is boring)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chennai, is boring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hyderabad, is boring)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hyderabad, is boring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hyderabad, is boring)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hyderabad, is boring)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hyderabad, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hyderabad, is boring)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hyderabad, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hyderabad, is boring)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(chennai, is boring)