hydra: be good on rasha

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monster
Weight: 0.60
, animal
Weight: 0.56
, constellation
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, organism
Weight: 0.53
Siblings medusa
Weight: 0.34
, creature
Weight: 0.33
, chimera
Weight: 0.33
, cyclops
Weight: 0.33
, amoeba
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good on rasha 1.00
has quality good 0.84
be on vomir 0.82
is terrible 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(medusa, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(medusa, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(medusa, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cyclops, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cyclops, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(hydra, be good on rasha)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hydra, be on vomir)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hydra, be on vomir)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hydra, be on vomir)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hydra, be on vomir)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hydra, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hydra, is terrible)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hydra, is terrible)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hydra, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hydra, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hydra, is terrible)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hydra, is terrible)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(hydra, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(hydra, be good on rasha)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hydra, be good on rasha)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(medusa, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(hydra, be good on rasha)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cyclops, has quality good)