hydra: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monster
Weight: 0.60
, animal
Weight: 0.56
, constellation
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, organism
Weight: 0.53
Siblings medusa
Weight: 0.34
, creature
Weight: 0.33
, chimera
Weight: 0.33
, cyclops
Weight: 0.33
, amoeba
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
has quality good 0.84
is system inefficient 0.78
is digestive system inefficient 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(medusa, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(medusa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(medusa, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cyclops, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cyclops, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hydra, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hydra, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hydra, is digestive system inefficient)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hydra, is system inefficient)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(hydra, is digestive system inefficient)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(hydra, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hydra, is system inefficient)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hydra, is system inefficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hydra, is system inefficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hydra, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hydra, is digestive system inefficient)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hydra, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hydra, is digestive system inefficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hydra, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hydra, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(medusa, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hydra, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cyclops, has quality good)