hyena: has physical part legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.64
, leopard
Weight: 0.63
, predator
Weight: 0.61
, species
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cheetah
Weight: 0.36
, jackal
Weight: 0.36
, llama
Weight: 0.35
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part legs 1.00
have back legs 0.89
is legs longer 0.87
have longer legs 0.87
have front legs 0.87
have short legs 0.87
is front legs 0.87
is front legs longer 0.86
have longer front legs 0.86
have short back legs 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(llama, have short legs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(cheetah, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cheetah, has physical part legs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(llama, have short legs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(llama, have short legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(hyena, has physical part legs)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hyena, have longer front legs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hyena, is front legs longer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hyena, have short back legs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(hyena, have longer front legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hyena, have short back legs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(hyena, is front legs longer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(hyena, have short back legs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hyena, have longer front legs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hyena, is front legs longer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hyena, have short back legs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hyena, have longer front legs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hyena, is front legs longer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hyena, has physical part legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hyena, has physical part legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cheetah, has physical part legs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hyena, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(llama, have short legs)