hypnosis: affect types

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents modality
Weight: 0.63
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acupuncture
Weight: 0.35
, reflexology
Weight: 0.34
, chiropractic
Weight: 0.33
, acupressure
Weight: 0.33
, gene therapy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect types 1.00
affect dark types 0.92
affect people 0.82
be different in different areas 0.78
be is related 0.77
be different in areas 0.76
have impact on individuals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(method, be is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hypnosis, affect types)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(practice, be different in different areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hypnosis, affect types)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(practice, be different in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hypnosis, affect types)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(method, have impact on individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hypnosis, affect types)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(method, have impact on individuals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(practice, be different in areas)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(practice, be different in different areas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(method, be is related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(method, be is related)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(practice, be different in different areas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, have impact on individuals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(practice, be different in areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, affect people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(practice, be different in different areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, affect types)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(method, be is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, affect types)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(practice, be different in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, affect types)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(method, have impact on individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, affect types)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(acupuncture, affect people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, affect people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hypnosis, affect types)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect dark types)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(hypnosis, affect dark types)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hypnosis, affect dark types)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hypnosis, affect dark types)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hypnosis, affect types)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(method, have impact on individuals)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(practice, be different in areas)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(practice, be different in different areas)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(method, be is related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(acupuncture, affect people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(method, have impact on individuals)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(practice, be different in areas)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(practice, be different in different areas)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hypnosis, affect types) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(method, be is related)