hysterectomy: has quality jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.76
, surgery
Weight: 0.76
, operation
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.55
, treatment
Weight: 0.55
Siblings mastectomy
Weight: 0.41
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.40
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.39
, vasectomy
Weight: 0.38
, prostatectomy
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality jokes 1.00
jokes 0.94
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vasectomy, has quality jokes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(vasectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(vasectomy, has quality jokes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(hysterectomy, jokes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, jokes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, jokes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, jokes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(vasectomy, has quality jokes)