ibm: be good company work for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardware
Weight: 0.65
, software company
Weight: 0.62
, vendor
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings microsoft
Weight: 0.36
, netscape
Weight: 0.35
, macromedia
Weight: 0.34
, amazon
Weight: 0.34
, sony
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good company work for 1.00
be good company work 0.99
is great company 0.91
has state company 0.84
be in business 0.80
be good stock buy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has state company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(microsoft, has state company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has state company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ibm, be good company work for)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(ibm, be good company work)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ibm, be good company work)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ibm, be good company work)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(ibm, is great company)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ibm, is great company)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ibm, is great company)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ibm, be good company work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ibm, has state company)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(ibm, has state company)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ibm, be in business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(ibm, is great company)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ibm, be in business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ibm, has state company)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ibm, be in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ibm, be good stock buy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ibm, be good stock buy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ibm, be good stock buy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ibm, be in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(ibm, be good stock buy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ibm, has state company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ibm, be good company work for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ibm, be good company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ibm, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(microsoft, has state company)