ibm: be in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardware
Weight: 0.65
, software company
Weight: 0.62
, vendor
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings microsoft
Weight: 0.36
, netscape
Weight: 0.35
, macromedia
Weight: 0.34
, amazon
Weight: 0.34
, sony
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in business 1.00
be good company work for 0.80
be good company work 0.80
is great company 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ibm, be in business)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ibm, be good company work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(ibm, is great company)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(ibm, is great company)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ibm, be good company work for)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ibm, is great company)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ibm, is great company)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ibm, be good company work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(ibm, be good company work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ibm, be good company work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ibm, be good company work for)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ibm, be good company work for)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ibm, be good company work for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ibm, be in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ibm, be in business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ibm, be in business)