ibm: has state success

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardware
Weight: 0.65
, software company
Weight: 0.62
, vendor
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings microsoft
Weight: 0.36
, netscape
Weight: 0.35
, macromedia
Weight: 0.34
, amazon
Weight: 0.34
, sony
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state success 1.00
is successful 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sony, is successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sony, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sony, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ibm, has state success)

Similarity expansion

0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ibm, is successful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ibm, is successful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ibm, is successful)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ibm, is successful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ibm, has state success)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ibm, has state success)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ibm, has state success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sony, is successful)