ice cream: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.71
, ice cube
Weight: 0.70
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.59
, ice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cream cheese
Weight: 0.73
, cottage cheese
Weight: 0.67
, chocolate
Weight: 0.64
, hot coffee
Weight: 0.64
, pudding
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be bad for health 0.77
go to solid 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cream cheese, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cottage cheese, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pudding, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pudding, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pudding, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cottage cheese, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cottage cheese, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cream cheese, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cream cheese, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ice cream, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ice cream, go to solid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ice cream, go to solid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ice cream, go to solid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, go to solid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pudding, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cottage cheese, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cream cheese, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality good)