ice skater: wear special type

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.63
, performer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hockey player
Weight: 0.37
, gymnast
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.34
, tennis player
Weight: 0.34
, hockey
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear special type 1.00
wear type 0.94
wear special type of clothing 0.93
wear type of clothing 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ice skater, wear special type)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear type)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(ice skater, wear type)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ice skater, wear type)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear type of clothing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ice skater, wear special type of clothing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ice skater, wear type of clothing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear special type of clothing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ice skater, wear type of clothing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ice skater, wear special type of clothing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear special type of clothing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear type)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear type of clothing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear special type)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ice skater, wear special type)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear special type)