ice skater: wear tights

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.63
, performer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hockey player
Weight: 0.37
, gymnast
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.34
, tennis player
Weight: 0.34
, hockey
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear tights 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(athlete, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear tights)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(performer, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear tights)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(performer, wear tights)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(athlete, wear tights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear tights)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(athlete, wear tights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(athlete, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ice skater, wear tights)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(performer, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ice skater, wear tights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(ice skater, wear tights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear tights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear tights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(performer, wear tights)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(athlete, wear tights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(performer, wear tights)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ice skater, wear tights)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(athlete, wear tights)