ice: burn black

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ice cream
Weight: 0.77
, cold
Weight: 0.65
, force
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cream cheese
Weight: 0.32
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.32
, atmospheric pressure
Weight: 0.32
, chocolate
Weight: 0.32
, shallow water
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
burn black 1.00
turn white 0.78
go white 0.77
has color black 0.77
be rubbed on burnt part of skin 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, turn white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, go white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chocolate, turn white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chocolate, turn white)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(chocolate, go white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chocolate, go white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(ice, burn black)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ice, turn white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ice, go white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(ice, go white)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(ice, turn white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ice, turn white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ice, go white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ice, go white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ice, turn white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ice, burn black)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ice, burn black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chocolate, turn white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ice, burn black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chocolate, go white)