icing sugar: be used in baking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.54
, recipe
Weight: 0.48
, good
Weight: 0.32
Siblings refined sugar
Weight: 0.35
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.33
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, lime juice
Weight: 0.33
, coconut
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in baking 1.00
be important in baking 0.96
need baking 0.96
call in baking 0.93
have baking soda 0.88
be used in cooking 0.87
baking soda 0.87
call for baking soda 0.87
be used in cakes 0.81
be for pastry 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(recipe, be important in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(recipe, need baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(recipe, call in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(recipe, have baking soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(recipe, baking soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(recipe, call for baking soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(recipe, call for baking soda)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(recipe, baking soda)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(recipe, call in baking)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(recipe, have baking soda)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(recipe, need baking)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(recipe, be important in baking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(recipe, call for baking soda)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(recipe, baking soda)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(recipe, have baking soda)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(recipe, call in baking)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(recipe, need baking)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(recipe, be important in baking)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(coconut, be used in cooking)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(recipe, be important in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(recipe, need baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(recipe, call in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(recipe, have baking soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(recipe, baking soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(recipe, call for baking soda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(coconut, be used in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(coconut, be used in cooking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(icing sugar, be used in baking)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in cakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, be used in cakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(icing sugar, be used in cakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be used in cakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(recipe, call for baking soda)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recipe, baking soda)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recipe, call in baking)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(recipe, need baking)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(recipe, have baking soda)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recipe, be important in baking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(coconut, be used in cooking)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(recipe, call for baking soda)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recipe, baking soda)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recipe, call in baking)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(recipe, need baking)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(recipe, have baking soda)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(icing sugar, be used in baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recipe, be important in baking)