icing: was for cakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, frosting
Weight: 0.51
, product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.32
, ice maker
Weight: 0.32
, ice cube
Weight: 0.32
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.32
, layer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was for cakes 1.00
was for cakes invented 0.92
fall off cake 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(icing, was for cakes)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(icing, fall off cake)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(icing, fall off cake)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(icing, fall off cake)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(icing, fall off cake)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(icing, was for cakes invented)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(icing, was for cakes invented)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(icing, was for cakes invented)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(icing, was for cakes invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(icing, was for cakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(icing, was for cakes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(icing, was for cakes)