idaho: be called state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called state 1.00
be niccknamed state 0.91
has state state 0.89
is red state 0.78
be called potato state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, be called state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wyoming, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is red state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(missouri, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(idaho, be called state)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(idaho, be niccknamed state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, has state state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be niccknamed state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(idaho, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called potato state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is red state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(idaho, be niccknamed state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(idaho, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(idaho, be called potato state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(idaho, be niccknamed state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(idaho, be called potato state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(idaho, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(idaho, is red state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(idaho, be called potato state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(idaho, is red state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(idaho, is red state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be called state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wyoming, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)