idaho: be in two time zones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in two time zones 1.00
have two time zones 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be in two time zones)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, have two time zones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tennessee, have two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tennessee, have two time zones)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tennessee, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be in two time zones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(idaho, be in two time zones)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(idaho, have two time zones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(idaho, have two time zones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(idaho, have two time zones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, have two time zones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be in two time zones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(idaho, be in two time zones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, have two time zones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be in two time zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tennessee, be in two time zones)