idaho: have tornadoes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tornadoes 1.00
have least tornadoes 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, have tornadoes)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have tornadoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arkansas, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(arkansas, have tornadoes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(oklahoma, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have tornadoes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(idaho, have tornadoes)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(idaho, have least tornadoes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(idaho, have least tornadoes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(idaho, have least tornadoes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(idaho, have least tornadoes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(idaho, have tornadoes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(idaho, have tornadoes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(arkansas, have tornadoes)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(idaho, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have tornadoes)