:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is poor)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(idaho, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(idaho, is poor)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(idaho, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(idaho, is poor)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is poor)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(missouri, is poor)