ideal: be seen as good lead in jp

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, god
Weight: 0.53
, idea
Weight: 0.51
, method
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.49
Siblings perfect
Weight: 0.33
, nice
Weight: 0.32
, like
Weight: 0.31
, good
Weight: 0.31
, common sense
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be seen as good lead in jp 1.00
be seen as lead in jp 0.99
be seen as good lead 0.85
be seen as lead 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ideal, be seen as lead in jp)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ideal, be seen as lead in jp)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(ideal, be seen as lead in jp)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ideal, be seen as lead)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ideal, be seen as good lead)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ideal, be seen as lead)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ideal, be seen as lead in jp)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ideal, be seen as lead)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(ideal, be seen as good lead)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ideal, be seen as good lead)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(ideal, be seen as lead)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ideal, be seen as good lead)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ideal, be seen as good lead in jp)