ignorance: be important from economic standpoint

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bliss
Weight: 0.64
, cause
Weight: 0.62
, obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laziness
Weight: 0.35
, fear
Weight: 0.33
, negligence
Weight: 0.33
, bias
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important from economic standpoint 1.00
be important from standpoint 0.96
alter perspective 0.78
be important in business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bias, alter perspective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bias, alter perspective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(bias, alter perspective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, be important from standpoint)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ignorance, be important from standpoint)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(ignorance, be important from standpoint)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ignorance, be important from standpoint)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(bias, alter perspective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(ignorance, be important from economic standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)