ignorance: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bliss
Weight: 0.64
, cause
Weight: 0.62
, obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laziness
Weight: 0.35
, fear
Weight: 0.33
, negligence
Weight: 0.33
, bias
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
feel good 0.80
is good thing 0.78
has quality evil 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bliss, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(bliss, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(bliss, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fear, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fear, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laziness, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fear, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bliss, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fear, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(fear, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(laziness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bias, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bias, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bias, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bias, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(laziness, feel good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(laziness, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fear, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fear, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fear, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fear, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(ignorance, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ignorance, is good thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(ignorance, is good thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, is good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ignorance, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bliss, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fear, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bias, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bias, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fear, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bias, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(laziness, feel good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fear, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bliss, has quality bad)