ignorance: is bliss mean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bliss
Weight: 0.64
, cause
Weight: 0.62
, obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laziness
Weight: 0.35
, fear
Weight: 0.33
, negligence
Weight: 0.33
, bias
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bliss mean 1.00
be bliss 0.98
has state bliss 0.96
is bliss wrong 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(ignorance, is bliss mean)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state bliss)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, be bliss)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(ignorance, be bliss)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ignorance, has state bliss)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ignorance, be bliss)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ignorance, be bliss)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has state bliss)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ignorance, has state bliss)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ignorance, is bliss wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss mean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss mean)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ignorance, is bliss mean)