ignorance: is bliss wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bliss
Weight: 0.64
, cause
Weight: 0.62
, obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laziness
Weight: 0.35
, fear
Weight: 0.33
, negligence
Weight: 0.33
, bias
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bliss wrong 1.00
be bliss 0.95
is bliss mean 0.95
has state bliss 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(ignorance, is bliss wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ignorance, be bliss)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state bliss)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has state bliss)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(ignorance, be bliss)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, be bliss)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ignorance, has state bliss)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ignorance, is bliss mean)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ignorance, be bliss)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ignorance, has state bliss)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss mean)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(ignorance, is bliss mean)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ignorance, is bliss mean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, is bliss wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ignorance, is bliss wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ignorance, is bliss wrong)