iguana: is good pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lizard
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, reptile
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alligator
Weight: 0.37
, turtle
Weight: 0.37
, frog
Weight: 0.37
, boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pet 1.00
has state pet 0.94
make good pets 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(turtle, has state pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(turtle, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(turtle, has state pet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(iguana, is good pet)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(iguana, has state pet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(iguana, has state pet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(iguana, make good pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(iguana, make good pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(iguana, has state pet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(iguana, make good pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(iguana, make good pets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iguana, has state pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(iguana, is good pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(iguana, is good pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(iguana, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(turtle, has state pet)