illinois: be considered midwest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered midwest 1.00
be in midwest 0.96
is midwest 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(michigan, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illinois, be considered midwest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in midwest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in midwest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be in midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be in midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is midwest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is midwest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(michigan, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(indiana, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(indiana, be in midwest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ohio, is midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ohio, is midwest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(chicago, is midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chicago, is midwest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ohio, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ohio, be in midwest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(indiana, is midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indiana, is midwest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(illinois, be considered midwest)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(illinois, is midwest)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illinois, is midwest)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(illinois, be in midwest)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(illinois, be in midwest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(illinois, is midwest)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(illinois, be in midwest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is midwest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in midwest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illinois, be considered midwest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(michigan, be in midwest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicago, is midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(indiana, is midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(indiana, be in midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ohio, is midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be in midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(michigan, be in midwest)