illinois: be worst state live in

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worst state live in 1.00
be worst state live 1.00
is bad state 0.79
be good place live 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ohio, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good place live)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(illinois, be worst state live in)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(illinois, be worst state live)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(illinois, be worst state live)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(illinois, be worst state live)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(illinois, is bad state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(illinois, be good place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(illinois, be good place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(illinois, be good place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illinois, be worst state live in)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ohio, be good place live)